Sunday, 4 December 2011

dr_phil_physics: (steampunk-royal-keyboard)
A Saturday Goal

Off to the movies on Saturday afternoon, as we are sorely behind, and I promised Mrs. Dr. Phil a Thai dinner -- after I had to eat Thai down in Atlanta. So after the movie, it was just hop onto I-196 and down to the new Baldwin Ave. half-exit and Bangkok Taste. We were going to start with a couple of vegetarian Thai spring rolls, but instead I spotted a peanut curry noddle dish, so we added that to the curried eggplant and Thai BBQ duck -- and had a splendid meal.

There was a table near us with a large group, including three little girls, each one blonder and shorter than the next. They were very busy with their crayons and were very cute and well behaved.

Hugo 3D [PG]
Celebration Cinema North, Theatre #4, 3:15pm

There's been a lot of talk about Martin Scorsese's first 3D film as an homage to film. But this is thoroughly delightful and convoluted and beautifully filmed movie which is as entertaining a two hours as you'll find anywhere. It's a steampunk dream, but rooted in a reasonable version of history and technology. There's clockwork mechanisms galore, both large and small, steam trains, the Paris train station -- both gleaming public spaces and dirty, steamy bowels, love of all sizes and depths, an automaton that can write, and orphans.

Hugo is a boy trying to survive by secretly keeping the clocks running in the station. His father is dead and his uncle has abandoned him, both were clockmakers of a sort. The train station is populated with a variety of people living and working there. The toy seller, the book seller -- played by Ben Kingsley and Christopher Lee, respectively -- the cafe owner, the newspaper seller, the flower seller, and... (duh-duh-DUH) the station inspector. The last is played by Borat, er, Sacha Baron Cohen in what I think is his finest role. Needless to say Hugo is constantly in danger from being deported to the orphanage by the station inspector, who has no idea Hugo is keeping his station on time.

Is this realistic? SF? Fantasy? Yes. It is also about the people who work in the station, rather than travel through it. It's about books and movies, especially Harold Lloyd and Georges Méliès. It is about the aftermaths of The Great War, what would later become known as World War I, and how you cannot understand the period between the wars without knowing how WW I impacted people.

Scorsese's attention to details, in both characters and technical issues, is a delight. The station inspector has a lovely Doberman -- and there's a very cute side story involving a long hair dachshund. There's something here to keep everyone happy, and I haven't provided a single spoiler. (grin)

Except for a bit of focus error I fought with in a scene right near the end, this is one of the better done 3D movies. It is sharp and clear and detailed. If this is how and why they want to make 3D movies, it's fine with me -- not like some of the crap that's been passed as 3D-worthy in the last couple of years. What in the world was Martin Scorsese thinking? I think he was enchanted with the story and I think we're going to have to get a copy of Brian Selznick's The Invention of Hugo Cabret and see what the book is all about.

Highly Recommended

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (bow-winslet)
What A Coincidence

Yesterday we went to see Hugo in 3D. So what were the odds that we'd see movie trailers aimed at kids and/or in 3D?

Why YES -- these are all coming in 3D.

So... how about The Pirates? From the animators of Chicken Run and Wallace and Grommit. Please? I haven't laughed so hard during a trailer EVER!

The next trailer was Yet Another Pirate Opening. But we've seen this before, it's for Spielberg's Tintin. Looks like fun. But I am waiting to hear from someone who is a longtime Tintin fan, preferably from Europe, as to whether they've captured this right. Americans by and large have never taken to Tintin.

The Lorax -- Oh thank god that it's not a Dr. Seusss live-action movie with Jim Carrey or Mike Myers. Having said that, the animated artwork looks good, but I got no hint of Dr. Seuss-ish dialogue.

Revise, Revise, Revise

Beauty and the Beast in 3D makes a January return. Automatic Cash Machine, but sadly it looks a little dated. Disney is capable of screwing things up, so we'll pass.

It's been a few years since George Lucas has messed with us, so no surprise that Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace is getting the 3D treatment. I'm sure many will ban this. But given the popularity of the Star Wars merchandise -- Star Wars LEGO I'm looking at you -- it makes tremendous sense to introduce the youngsters to Star Wars on the big screen. And despite Jar-Jar Who Shall Not Be Named, compared to Episode III, Episode I has some great scenes. And the 3D-ization clips we saw looked good. I'd expect Lucas to technically tweak this right.

15 April 1912 + 100 Years

Titanic. After Avatar, does anyone question James Cameron's technical understanding of 3D? Obviously it's been years since Dr. Phil has seen one of his favoritest movies on the big screen. I'd forgotten how much I enjoyed it the many times I saw it first-run. And it'll be a century since the sinking. Will there be midnight showings designed to mark the 2:20am sinking? (evil grin)

I am so there. (swoon)

Have They Got This Now?

At Celebration Theatre, they were using a different 3D projection system. Certainly Hugo looked outstanding. And the two big retro converted films have heavy CGI use, which may facilitate the 3D conversion process. So I haven't given up on 3D if done right by competent filmmakers. But if this flight of movies tanks, I think Hollywood will rethink 3D as a cash conversion process.

Dr. Phil

Profile

dr_phil_physics: (Default)
dr_phil_physics

April 2016

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3 4567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Links

Email: drphil at

dr-phil-physics.com

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Monday, 14 July 2025 10:06
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios