dr_phil_physics: (hal-9000)
Dear Gmail:

You aren't impressing me with a dialog box saying Switch to the new look -- without telling me WHY I want to switch. Today I saw in Gmail that Gmail's getting a new look soon. Learn more Dismiss. Clicking the Learn More gave me:
About Gmail’s new look

A new look

Watch the video to get an overview of the improvements.

You will automatically get upgraded to the new look soon. If you don't want to wait, you can switch to it today by logging into Gmail and clicking Switch to the new look.


I suppose I'm supposed to be impressed that you're warning me that you're about to fuck up Gmail, as opposed to Facebook that just fucks it up. But it all seems more like a threat.

See, I'm tired of having to bloody upgrade all the time. Especially on YOUR schedule and not mine. And it doesn't inspire confidence that lots of people are complaining about the so-called improvements.

And Google? Get off my lawn while you're at it.

Dr. Phil

PS -- I looked at the video. Kudos for putting in captions, since I normally run with the sound off. But in parts it looks like they want Gmail to look more like Facebook. Or G+. Which if I wanted to use, I'd look at more than once a month...
dr_phil_physics: (hal-9000)
From A Facebook Post I Made:
Microsoft released a new version of Windows today? I'm still waiting for a new version of Microsoft. -- Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (7of9borg)
The First Day Has Come And Mostly Gone

Microsoft Windows 7 Release Day. Oh boy. Oh thrill. I even forgot it was October 22nd, except they did a segment about Win7 on WOOD-AM radio and a couple of people I follow online were installing it today. (And like everything else which falls off the truck early, I guess there were a few machines out with Win7 back on the 13th.) Everyone seems to want to know if it's faster than Vista. Who cares? It needs to be faster than XP Pro, doesn't it?

But the best thing is the new Mac Ad: "Broken Promises" shows a litany of promises that Windows N will not have any of the problems of Windows N-1. Going all the way back to Windows 2. (hee-hee)

The End Of Life As We Know It

Of course Redmond still wants to stop updating Windows XP the end of December. Which is just two months and change away. I'm so sorry Microsoft, but if there are problems with Windows 7, you'll still be giving out customer service ticket numbers two months from now -- way short of Windows 7 Service Pack 1, and certainly far from Win7 SP2, which is pretty much the gold standard for some people's idea of stable upgrades.

I don't see that they can convince the multitude of XP users to upgrade to 7 in two months. And Lord knows that no one in their right mind who has put it off this long is going to choose to do an interim upgrade to Vista.

And what's this crap about ending XP updates anyway -- you've still been selling Windows XP Home netbooks all summer. And now they have to upgrade? On low powered, low memory machines? Remember when I said that Win7 has to be faster than XP, not faster than Vista? And not on top of the line machines, either.

Another Shot In The Foot

Oh and what's this? There's no direct upgrade path from XP to 7? My motivation for doing a cold install of an OS and complete reinstall of all my software for an OS I don't know will work properly is... what? Vanity? Hubris? Stupidity? On Microsoft's part?

Because all MS has been touting 7 for is... children touting Win7. And that's not a sales pitch or a crushing inspiration for the rest of us.

This is developing into a clusterfuck epic fail -- and I don't even know whether Win7 does work or doesn't. It might. But Microsoft's Convert Or Die policy, based on a history of upgrades which didn't go well, is absurd.

Dr. Phil

PS - Remember, Microsoft, I own and use computers to do work, to run application software -- not to run Windows. Or any OS. I need to have one, but it's not the bottom line unless it insists on making it the end of the line.
dr_phil_physics: (wary-winslet)
The Lamest Windows Campaign Ever?

Two weeks ago I ragged on Microsoft's ads for Windows 7 which featured this little girl cutting and pasting blurbs about Windows 7 into pictures with animals. Well, there are now at least three versions of this ad. All have different animal graphics. And all HAVE THE SAME SET OF PRO-WINDOWS 7 BLURBS.

Come on, Microsoft. For crying out loud, your new OS is coming out in just a few weeks. And all you've done for the last few weeks is try to convince me that Windows 7 is a great OS for toddlers. This is your great marketing plan? For this you want me to abandon Windows XP Pro? Dream on.

Fire your advertising company and fire the middle-management layer that approved this crap.

Or are you telling me that Windows 7 is so lame and so flawed, that you can't even figure out how to sell it? After all, you had the silly Windows Mojave (equals Vista) ads where people went gah-gah over computers that didn't even do anything for them.

Do you remember why we bought computers in the first place? I don't know about anyone else, but I do work on them. My work. NOT your work. So you're damned OS better work. But you're not convincing me about this new Windows. Really, you're not.

Those Mac Ads

The Mac & PC ads? Those ads are so kicking Microsoft's butt from one end of the country to another. Even people I know who would never buy a Mac find them funny. And there are a LOT of them. Typically I see about 2 or 3 in rotation at any given time. Like right now, I've seen (1) PC in a Mac guy suit and telling the person to buy a PC instead, (2) the one with the suave Top Of The Line PC who tells the lady to call, "when you're ready to compromise", and (3) the one with the bubble wrap and the cupholders. Cupholders! Not only was that a joke in the hey-day of the minivan and the SUV, but a staple joke of the IT tech support world is about the cupholder (CD tray) in the PC not working right.

Those Other Windows Ads

The campaign about You Find It, We'll Buy It? You know, a lot of people will compromise on what they'll buy if someone is in the parking lot willing to give them cash to buy what they want them to buy. Smooth move. I'd get a Vista laptop if someone else was paying for it. Of course I might put a Virtual PC or VMware on it so I can run Windows XP Professional. Because if it was MY machine after YOU bought it, why I'd be able to run anything I want in order get some work done.

But giving people money to buy your own machines doesn't seem like a sustainable business model.

Me? I'm not very excited about the Windows 7 future.

Sorry.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (wary-winslet)
10-22-2009: The End Of The World Is Coming

Microsoft is getting ready to release Windows 7 to the world. Windows 7? Really? Actually, I know it's Windows NT4, NT5 (2000), NT5.1 (XP), NT5.1 (6) (Vista)... so obviously WIndows 7 comes after NT, 2000, XP and Vista. What?

But the marketing campaign... shakes head. The latest commercial with some six-year-old "on Daddy's laptop" cutting and pasting preliminary Windows 7 reviews into shots of marshmallows, bunnies and hamsters with skimmer hats. Right... I am surely going to believe someone who cannot read the big words properly. I'd rather have, what did they do? Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates stealing a stuffed giraffe to sell Vista? Geesh.

We've Been Through This Before

It's actually possible to fix Windows. XP Pro SP2/SP3 is pretty stable, for example, and its library of printer drivers is a helluva lot more successful than the Vista driver situation. Not that we'd ever want to actually ever print any of the work on OUR computers. Using hardware we actually ALREADY OWN.

But seriously.

WIndows 1.04 shipped with some IBM PS/2 systems -- and was worthless and useless.

There was Windows 286 versus Windows 386... and then Windows 3.0, which really didn't work right and had early Word and Excel for Windows which didn't work right. Windows 3.1 and 3.11 -- they actually performed good enough that Windows actually began showing up on machines.

Windows 95 made a better interface and allowed easier windowing and task switching. Of course it was supposed to work with USB, and Windows 95B OSR2 had USB drivers -- which didn't work with most USB devices without crashing or ignoring the USB hardware.

Windows 98 fixed the USB problems and... oh crap, Win98 had enough problems they had to come out with Windows 98 Second Edition. Which actually works. Then they upgraded it to Windows Me Millennium Edition and the shit really hit the fan. Not a good upgrade, though some computers equipped with Win98ME work okay -- hell, I have a Sony laptop with Win98ME I still use, go figure.

Meanwhile, in the NT parallel universe, NT 3.51 was functional, but NT 4.0 Professional was much better. Service Pack 6a was good enough that SP7 was cancelled.

Windows NT 5 became Windows 2000 Professional and shipped with thousands of bugs. But it's up to what, SP4? SP5? And some IT departments still use it because they've made it stable.

And XP. Once we got to Windows XP SP2, it was worth using. Even Win XP Home SP3 on netbooks seems to work. The same, I fear, cannot be said for all users of Windows Vista, which has so many damned versions no one can quite keep them all straight.

Bottom Line

So you want us to think that Windows 7 is the greatest thing since sliced bread, because you say so?

I don't think so.

Call me in 2012 when you've got Win 7 SP2/SP3 going. Meanwhile, stop with this nonsense of planning to kill Windows XP too soon. Really.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (Default)
End Of Day One

The 2009 Great Heating and Cooling Project began with bangs and clatters and a furnacectomy. It ends with nary a sound, as the new furnace is installed and working. New blower fan appears to have more oomph but the whole unit is whisper quiet. Not sure we'll know when it's running. (grin) Reminds me of a comment I heard once that said that Americans would never buy Japanese vacuum cleaners -- or at least those models destined for the domestic Japanese market -- because Americans want suck they can HEAR and the Japanese want unobtrusive suck. Mrs. Dr. Phil has commented she'd really like to try the latter. I've been known to vacuum wearing a pair of 35 dB shooting muffs.

The warm glow of the home fires...

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (wary-winslet)
The Great Stimulus Project of 2009

And now giant mutant voles are eating into the side of the house, too.

Remember that scene in the medical dramas where they open up some poor guys chest and remove his heart, only to discover that the donor heart is defective or the connective tissue or arteries just fall apart when they try to sew it all back together again? Well thank goodness we're not there yet. But our furnace is sitting in the garage and it isn't even noon yet. (grin)

Alas, poor York, I knew ye well these past sixteen years...

Back in 2007 we had the Great Rinnai Hot Water Heater, Sump Pump and Kohler Backup Generator Project, which all stemmed from the fact that our water heater was getting old and there was no place to drain it in the basement... The 2009 Great Heating and Cooling Project began with the simple desire to raise the humidity in the house during the winter. It's supposed to be good for the sinuses and keep down colds, flu and sinus infections. But putting a whole house humidifier on a nearly sixteen year old furnace seemed silly. Oh, and the one thing I've always hated about the current furnace were the supposedly washable furnace filters. No frame, stiff scratchy fiberglass and impossible to get in and out. Did NOT help our sinuses that we never cleaned the damned thing very often.

So let's talk about a new furnace. And as long as we are, what about central air conditioning? Well, it turns out 2009 is great year to be talking about this sort of stuff. There's some energy efficiency Federal tax rebate money for going high efficiency. In our case it means we could've spent X dollars for a 90% efficient furnace to replace the 85% York we have (uh, had). Or we could spend Y dollars for a 95% efficient furnace plus a heat pump. Y - X = around $1500 and we'd qualify for the $1500 max rebate. So for the same net money, we can get a more efficient heating system and essentially free central A.C. for the summer.

As for air filtration, we looked at an $800 electrostatic unit, but you have to wash the stainless steel blades every couple of weeks. For about $250 we're getting this large cartridge unit that gets changed once a year for about $30. It's gonna take another sixteen years to get around to making up the cost differential with the one-a-year cartridge system -- no-brainer decision there, folks.

Banging and Klanging

So yesterday was Grading Day. And after a nap we went out to the movies and dinner at a Thai restaurant and a pleasant evening. Now Greg and his helper are busily changing our house. They've budgeted two days for the job, but have half of Friday penciled in for trouble-shooting.

And then I'm off to Penguicon!

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (Default)
The Cruelest Joke

I doubt many will argue that one of the boneheadest marketing blunders of all time was the introduction of New Coke in 1985. Some 77 days later Coca-Cola Classic came out and all was made better. Except... this time everyone switched over from cane sugar to high fructose corn syrup. Is this the source of obesity in America? Or was it the growth of overgrown portions? Or both?

Who cares? I've tasted cane sugar Coke since this, it's available from Mexico and for Passover, and frankly I think it's better. Bring back Real Coke. Hell, I've said this before -- call it Coke Premium and charge extra for it. The die-hard Coca-Cola fans will buy it. Really.

Pepsi Beats Them To It

Yesterday I saw a TV commercial for Pepsi Throwback. While Mrs. Dr. Phil mocked the name as "Pepsi Throw-up", the key point is that they are going (briefly) back to their cane sugar formula. Alas, Pepsi Throwback is a limited release product, slated to end on Saturday 13 June 2009. Perhaps we'll see how it sells. But a few weeks isn't long enough to see if it affects obesity and diabetes.

The Ball Is Back In Coke's Court

Coke Legacy anyone? Come on, bring it on!

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (upsidedown-winslet)
What's Wrong With This Description?

From a techie guy I know, here's a description of one team's effort to set up one of those fancy $17,000 Microsoft Surface large touchscreen computers. Read it and then come back here...

Now, the funny thing is we've all been there. Just before I went to Clarion in 2004, one of my 17" Micron VGA monitors burned up. And I was obliged to buy a 15" ViewSonic LCD monitor, which I had shipped to the Physics Dept. and then just took the box to the sorority house in East Lansing. The night I got there, I started setting up everything. And I couldn't get the damned cover off the back of the unit to plug in the cables. There was a sketchy little diagram on some sort of a Quick Start sheet, but the manual was on a CD-ROM. If there was a better explanation in the manual, it was going to be tough to read when the machine with the CD-ROM drive... needed a working monitor!

Eventually we discovered that the "arrow" shown on the diagram was completely misinterpretable, if that's a word, before I resulted to actually breaking the cover off. Come on, it was midnight and I wanted a working computer for six weeks!

Later I replaced the 17" Micron VGA monitor at the office with another, slightly newer model of ViewSonic 15" LCD panel and they'd not improved the installation process one twit. But at least I knew what I was up against.

Get With The Program

Sometimes I am convinced that the tech writers who write manuals believe the press that no one reads the manuals, so they just go messing with us. But I certainly have seen my share of manuals waxing on poetically about everything BUT setting up the machine and getting it to work.

Dammit, that's the point of all this, isn't it? Getting the damned thing to work? At least that's what I always thought I was spending my money on.

Rhodamine?

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (dramatic-winslet)
Never Rest, Never Surrender

If people weren't bastards, then one wouldn't have nearly as much pressure to upgrade software on computers. And one of the things which really annoys me is having to patch the OS, update anti-virus and upgrade firewalls -- none of which actually DO anything except run the computer and, hopefully, keep it safe. What a waste of time, all because a bunch of idiots have some misguided notion that they have a right to access my machines, mess with my data, steal my information, have demand rights on what little moneys that I have. Sonsofbitches.

ZoneAlarm

For the last several weeks, the Norton Anti-Virus on the Sony VAIO S270P laptop has wanted to give me a free copy of NAV 2009. Thing of it is, I installed NAV 2009 on the Fujitsu U810 and it was ugly. Basically the version on the install CD-ROM couldn't update itself and I had to download the updater from Symantec. Anyway, Symantec hates ZoneAlarm, so before I got around to do anything, I downloaded and installed the latest version of ZoneAlarm. Version 8 is leaner than Version 7, and claims to run faster. Hopefully it maintains itself as a decent firewall, because that's why I'm installing it.

NAV 2009 -- NOT

Pulled up the message saying they wanted to upgrade NAV to NAV 2009. Clicked on the link for More Information. Naturally it fired up my default browser, which of course is not Internet Explorer, and hung. I'd anticipated that, fired up IE, pasted in the URL and waited. And waited. Don't know what the problem was, maybe too many people were running the Symantec servers on a Sunday afternoon, but there's no way I'm going to do a huge download over the net if they cannot even load an informational web page.

Sorry Symantec. Fail today.

MathType 6.5

I've been using MathType 3.1, the full version of the Equation Editor used in Microsoft Word, for a long time. MathType 3.1, however, only runs for me on Windows 95, 98SE and NT4. I have a copy of MathType 5 for another machine, but I've been meaning to get a current version and hope that it works with my old MathType 3.1 equations in my Word 95 documents. I shouldn't have worried so much. Double-clicking on an equation in an existing file fired up the new MathType just fine. And now my Windows XP Pro machines will have proper equation editing, which makes my life a lot easier.

So... two out of three software upgrades went fine as they should. I suppose I should be grateful for 2-out-of-3. And to be honest, it was the FYI webpage at Symantec which failed to load -- I never got as far as upgrading NAV itself. Later on that one.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (Default)
Upgrades

Computers are funny creatures, since practically speaking they are the sum of their hardware, software, peripherals and other ancillary items. Most people think of upgrades of the big ticket items -- and that's a necessary part of it. But sometimes you have to upgrade the other parts. (grin)

For me upgrades are an uneven process. I am content to use older machines and older technology, and frankly the way I end up with teaching contracts I am mostly part-time and sometimes full-time. 2008-9, while a plunging disaster for some, ends up being a good year for me to make a few upgrades.

Making A Point

Back when I was heading out to the 2004 Clarion workshop, I ordered a pair of Swiss Army USB Memory "knives". Actually, one was a miniature knife and one was a "travel safe" version designed to go through post-9/11 security and had no blades. I had them engraved "DrPhil" and they came with 64MB of memory each. Sturdy, portable, I use these things every day to transfer files between machines at home, office and on the road. Later, I acquired newer memory units for the Swiss Army Memories with 1GB and 512MB of memory. But all that is so 2006.

The other day I wandered by the same Swiss Army Knives place in New Hampshire and found that they had a 2nd generation model with either a white LED light or a laser pointer, in place of the red LED light of the originals. And sizes of memory up to 16GB. I figured a pair of 8GB units would be sufficient. Have a lot more digital pictures to move around, too, besides class and writing files.

Circuit City Meltdown

When the big box store announced it was closing, I stopped by early on to see if there was any point in investing in a Nikon digital SLR. But at that time they weren't doing much of a discount, the staff was non-existent and the displays already picked over. More recently the discounts were advertised as deeper, and in the interim we found some old Circuit City gift cards which would go bye-bye when the doors closed. My parting words to Mrs. Dr. Phil was that if nothing else, I'd buy some memory cards.

The camera section was heavily wiped out. But they were discounting memory cards, so I picked up some SanDisk Extreme III and Ultra II cards -- 8GB Compact Flash for the old HP digital camera, 8GB SD card for the Fujitsu machines and an 8GB Memory Stick Pro Duo for my Sony digital camera. That was good enough for me.

But while getting into line, I ran across the Sony NSC-GC1 net video camera. Though I made a film in my senior year of high school, I've never owned a movie or video camera. I've thought about it, but never had the real need. At Christmastime, a couple of techie geeks in print and on radio were recommending getting one of the little YouTube enabled quickie video cameras like the Flip. The Sony unit? Essentially free with my gift cards and it uses Memory Stick Pro Duo for memory. Even if the unit was bad, it still would do something and for free? Why not?

Kindling

Then there was the announcement last week or so about Amazon.com's Kindle 2. At first I was intrigued -- having essentially a pre-paid 3G cellular arrangement for file transport sounds like a great deal. But then, like Lando Calrissian, further investigations left me muttering, "This deal is getting worse all the time." First, the Kindle 2 loses the Kindle's SD card slot. Too bad, because the Fujitsu's have built-in SD card slots and I have multi-card adapters and use SD cards for things, as noted. Second, while you could e-mail and send via 3G your own files to read on the Kindle 2, they want to charge me a dime for each download. A dime to read each of my OWN files? This is not free pre-paid 3G. And then there were the free e-books from Tor.com, etc. Things to read before I buy physical books. I mean, my interest in a digital e-book reader is NOT buying a lot of e-content from Amazon.com.

Sure, it looked like there was a workaround using the free Mobi writer to create files which were allowed to be updated over the USB cable, but having to have the cable, etc., decreases the usability. I've used e-book readers on PDA and the Rocket eBook, and never had problems with sending over my own files.

Then one of the comments mentioned the Sony PRS-505 Digital Book Reader and I remembered people talking about the quality of the electronic ink on its display. At the time I had decided the cost too high, but looking at it again I found the PRS-505 was actually cheaper than the Kindle 2 -- and you could get a light wedge case for reading in dim light or the dark, something the Kindle 2 doesn't offer. And the PRS-505 takes both SD and Memory Stick Duo cards, technologies I already use. 8GB is a lot of e-content. (grin) Sorry Amazon, Sony has the edge for my purposes.

Postscript

Alas, things don't always go according to plan. The geniuses at the Swiss Army Knife place shipped my order via UPS. Unfortunately, the address is a P.O. Box. UPS doesn't deliver to P.O. Boxes and the UPS depot is 30-40 miles away.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (hands-framing-winslet)
So There I Was, Minding My Business This Morning...

Using the No. 1 computer at work when the No. 2 APS Back-UPS 500 suddenly screamed it's alert and the No. 2 work computer shut off. Oh, damn? Guess that Uninteruptable Power Supply unit has reached the end of its useful life. I'm not sure how old the two UPS units are, but there's no point in trying to do the battery replacement option -- too expensive and I'd still have old UPS units. They date back several offices, which mean they're probably from 1998-99. That's ten years, which is pretty good for a lead acid battery backup device.

There's Always Good News

First, though I'd logged into NT4 on the No. 2 work computer, I hadn't yet done any work yet. So nothing was lost. Second, The ViewSonic VG510b LCD display is on the No. 1 UPS, so it didn't go out. Third, I was able to retrieve the power cord for the No. 2 work computer and plug it into a spare socket in another surge protector -- and I am back in business. Fourth, there's Amazon.com. (grin)

Now yesterday I was at Circuit City's Going Out of Business sale, and while standing in line, saw an array of APC UPS units -- but I didn't need one. Yet. (grin) Good news, is that I can get Amazon to do the heavy lifting of the new unit up to the point of the department office. (double-heavy-grin) These suckers are heavy! Looked at the 1350 W and 1500 W units, but they're more than I need, and they won't fit on the available desk slot. Still, might as well replace both ancient 500 W units, so I ordered an 800 W unit. It'll be here Wednesday.

Oh, And Early Adopters?

All you who bought Kindles from Amazon last year? Kindle 2 coming out shortly -- it uses a "free" 3G network, not Wi-Fi. Looks much more practical.

Dr. Phil

Hello, Moto

Sunday, 17 February 2008 17:13
dr_phil_physics: (kate-neverland-cell)
New Phones


Saturday, which was a perfectly lovely and sunny day, I had to run out to the Alltel store on Alpine Avenue to buy us two new phones. No, the pair of Motorola V60i cell phones we bought in January 2003 still work fine, thank you very much. But back in November we got a letter from Alltel informing us that our phones would have to be replaced by 31 March 2008. Seems the FCC is taking back some frequencies from the cell phone providers, bands used for analog service and the V60i's handle both digital and analog. Can't have them roaming and broadcasting on radio frequencies no longer assigned to them. Alltel's been our case for over a year to get new cell phones anyway, because the V60i doesn't have built-in GPS which now that we have Enhanced 9-1-1, is actually useful to the emergency services people.

Net result, the V60i's are over five years old, maybe it's time to replace them. Then again, my first Motorola MicroTAC lasted around eight years or so until I was unable to find a decent battery for it. (grin) The Alltel guys have such fun trying to figure out our ancient rate plans.

In With The New


Really, all we need are cellphones. We don't need a helluva lot of other beeps and whistles. The built-in camera, okay, that can be handy. But we are not going to be downloading ring tones, games, etc. to our phones.

Then why a RAZR? It's thinner, wider and longer than the V60i -- which actually makes it easier to hold. Color screen is a lot brighter. And it holds some 500 phone numbers, not 99. Indeed, I have, er had, nearly 99 numbers in my old V60i, and they had a lovely nest of wires hooked up to a PC which allowed them to dump everything from V60i to RAZR V3a.

Er, Not Quite

While it is true I did not have to rekey every single entry, I did find that "standards" have apparently changed. On my MicroTAC, Speed Dial #1 was hardwired for 9-1-1. On my V60i, I had to set Speed Dial #1 to 9-1-1, it wanted to make it Voicemail. And on the RAZR, because Speed Dial #1 was set to Voicemail, then (a) every entry in my V60i's contact list got the wrong Speed Dial number and (b) when it copied the contract list, it just copied the list, not the Speed Dial numbers, so there were no gaps in the list.

I had to sit there with V60i in my left hand and RAZR in my right and thumb through a lot of menus to manually synchronize the Speed Dial numbers, so that when I called my parents this afternoon, I actually got them instead of some emergency number at Western Michigan University.

I hate it when "easy to use" and "easy to upgrade" technology clearly isn't. It's just sloppy programming and sloppy attention to details.

Bottom Line

Because we were required to get new phones, we got nice new ones without any change in our current rate plan, which is actually a saving over we'd probably get set up with if we were starting from scratch. Since we haven't banged our heads on our current minutes allotments, I think we're good. (grin)

Dr. Phil

UPDATE: Dead photos updated 1-10-2015.

Profile

dr_phil_physics: (Default)
dr_phil_physics

April 2016

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3 4567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Links

Email: drphil at

dr-phil-physics.com

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, 23 May 2025 07:59
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios