dr_phil_physics: (dr-phil-nikon-f3-1983)
Slim Pickings

Last Saturday had some nice weather and I knew we were losing all the good leaves. Despite the risk of not getting any more leaves, I didn't take the time to go out. With the heavy rains and winds, most of the bright colors were gone this week. But it's been a funny fall color season, with a number of trees still green. By the end of the week, there were some new trees featuring the strong bright yellows that I've seen a lot of this year.

One Last Run

So I took the Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n out for one last run around town.


I haven't been through the Allendale Community Park in the long time -- this tree was just off the access road to the water tower. I opened up the lens to keep the background soft, but the depth of field was thinner than I wanted. (Click on photo for larger.)


This backlit tree was shot from the Blazer in the turnaround by the recycling area. (Click on photo for larger.)


I'm a sucker for backlit leaves and backlit/windblown flags -- by the Allendale Post Office I was able to get both around 4:45pm. (Click on photo for larger.)

There are some other photographs of fall colors shot in the last two weeks, but we'll have to wait to see them -- for the first time in years I've been shooting some film. Will get the rolls developed and scanned. Now that I'm running the Kodak at its full FX 14MP resolution, I figure comparing it against 35mm film would be useful.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (dr-phil-nikon-f3-1983)
The Autumnal Equinox Has Come And Gone

The average temperature this time of year is supposed to be around 72°F. Saturday the high was around 57°F -- and it's been in the 60s and low 70s all week, with the same for next week. And we've had a lot of rain, even hail. Hell, there've been a couple of water spouts on Lake Michigan recently, including one by South Haven today.

So I debated taking a camera with me on my errands late in the afternoon. Dark clouds. But also bright white ones and a good blue sky. I grabbed the Nikon D1 commuter bag and headed out.


Once again I didn't even get out of the driveway -- or out of the Blazer for that matter -- before I had my first shot. Bit of a risk with the D1, because its CCD sensor can overblow highlights, but not totally bad. (Click on photo for larger.)


Grab shot out of the Blazer's front windshield of this rainbow against a bright white cloud in blue sky and sunshine. I saw black clouds and rain in different areas, but never got rained on myself. (Click on photo for larger.)

Lots and lots of great clouds -- little black ones against white ones, etc. -- but mostly not in places where I could frame a good shot. Still it was a nice drive and I mailed some bills and did some errands.

The Elusive West Michigan Wild Turkeys

We've seen a lot of wild turkeys around here lately. Damned things are hard to photograph, despite the fact that we've seen flocks of a dozen or more at a time. Whatever they're eating, the hot weather this summer seems to have suited them.

Last Saturday when I went out on a picture taking expedition, I spotted a flock of turkeys crossing 78th Avenue north of M-45 -- they were silhouetted against the road by being in the shadow of trees on either side of the road. Despite (a) having the Kodak Pro SLR/n with me, (b) with the 70-300mm mounted and (c) sitting on the seat next to me, I couldn't come to a stop, get out and grab the camera before the whole ten or twelve crossed. And it wasn't like they were strutting all that fast.

Hunters talk of being made fools of by wild turkeys -- and I can attest to photographers having the same troubles. (grin)


On Tuesday I took the back way from M-45 to Wilson Avenue and spotted what I thought was a flock of Canadian geese in a field. But as I got closer I realized they were turkeys. Turned around and rolled the window down. I only had the little Sony, but I did record them. (Click on photo for larger.)

But this Saturday on the way back from Allendale, I slowed down because two vehicles ahead of me had stopped. Closer, I saw a couple of turkeys cross the road. Figured I'd missed them, but moving slowly I, too, had to come to a stop for another crossing.


Grab shot of wild turkeys lurking by the side of the road. (Click on photo for larger.)


Why did the turkey cross the road? To challenge drivers and photographers, of course. (Click on photo for larger.)

Still, one of the better wild turkey shots I've gotten, despite all the backlighting.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (dr-phil-nikon-f3-1983)
It's Rather Surprising

It's been not quite two years since I got back into Nikon SLR photography (DW) when I picked up a Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n. The intent was to get a relatively cheap Nikon FX digital SLR so I could use my old Nikon lenses from "the film era" (grin) with a full-frame 24×36mm sensor. But I ended up getting some newer CPU-chipped auto-focus lenses to work with the electronics of the Kodak.

So the Pro SLR/n is a bit of a Frankenstein, with the Kodak digital camera parts grafted onto a Nikon F80 consumer film SLR chassis. Lightweight and sometimes a bit squirrelly. Just under a year ago I spend even less money (grin) on getting some older Nikon D1-Series DX digital SLR cameras (DW), with the smaller 16×24mm DX sensor. The D1s are tanks -- much heavier duty and reliable than the Pro SLR/n.

The result is I haven't used the Pro SLR/n in a while. Which is a shame because (a) I have the thing and (b) it's a 13.87 megapixel camera, compared to the 6MP D1X and the 2.7MP D1/D1H. The funny thing is that I've been using the Pro SLR/n in a 6MP JPEG mode -- never taken more than one picture at the full resolution.

On Saturday, that ended as I went out on a sunny mid-70s September afternoon to see what I could get at 14MP. Of course, I'd forgotten in the interim that one has to meter the Kodak a little more closely than with the D1s. It's really a better studio camera than a field camera, which is why I got the D1s in the second place. (double-grin) And sometimes it fails to write to the memory card the first time, so you have to remember to flush the buffer. Like I said, I haven't given it much use time in 2012.


I think of all my lenses as my favorite lens. (grin) But I haven't nearly spent enough time with the ultrawide 20mm f2.8 AF-Nikkor -- I briefly had a 20mm lens for my Pentax equipment in high school and been a big fan of the 20mm ever since. This is a new house going up on 84th Avenue, which I've been documenting all summer. I used the 20mm to emphasize the hill of lawnless dirt it rests on. (Click on photo for larger.)


Between the summer drought and the coming fall, the fields are yellowing up. Here's some volunteer corn sticking up in a field on M-45 Lake Michigan Drive, shot with the 70-300mm f4-5.6 ED AF-Nikkor at 300mm. (Click on photo for larger.)


Distant dirt mounds off M-45 for the construction development at the Placid Waters ski-jumping water park. Looks like it should be part of some ancient archaeological or pyramid site. 70-300mm lens at 190mm. (Click on photo for larger.)


Part of our luxuriant goldenrod crop in the front yard at 300mm. Enlarged you can see the tiny bugs flitting around the flowers. (Click on photo for larger.)


Another shot. (Click on photo for larger.)


Slightly cropped shot of our thistles in fluffy bloom, still at 300mm. (Click on photo for larger.)


A somewhat abstract shot of partly backlit ground leaves in our overgrown front yard, with the unruly vines beginning to change colors. Also at 300mm. (Click on photo for larger.)

Overall, a good test run. I've got to play with the settings some more. Wasn't enchanted with the famous Nikon Matrix metering, so I reset all my DSLRs to do center-weighted metering. The D1s do okay, but some of the shots I didn't post here with the Kodak, I couldn't quite pull a decent image out of what was there. Needs more saturation.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (dr-phil-nikon-f3-1983)
The Difference Between Digital and Film Cameras

It's the film, of course. You can put all kinds of film into any 35mm camera -- and get all kinds of results. Digital also gives you all kinds of results, but they are from either changing settings or post-processing. Ultimately, the recording sensor in the digital camera is going to control what range of results you can get -- the camera itself just comes along for the ride.

Back when I did yearbook shooting in high school and college, we used to buy a roll or two a year of infrared film, using Ektachrome Infrared color slide film. Turns out that the sensors in many digital cameras are sensitive to IR light, so they have to have an IR blocking filter mounted to keep the images restricted to visible light.

I read up on places that replace the IR filter with a visible light filter, converting the digital camera to IR use only. Alas, that requires a spare camera body AND a couple of hundred dollars.

But... it turns out that those IR blocking filters are not 100% effective. So if you're willing to use a tripod and long exposures, you can still do digital IR photography if you have a visible light blocking filter for the lens. AND, one source says that the Nikon D1 Series DSLRs are very good for this, because they use a CCD instead of a CMOS sensor.

Plus I had an infrared filter.

I remember seeing this totally black filter in Wendy's camera bag amongst a group of filters. Paul had used it way back in the 70s when he played with some of the Kodak High Speed Infrared black & white film.


Tiffen Wratten No. 87 Series VIII filter.


The glass Wratten filters take the gelatin filter and sandwich it between two pieces of glass. This filter suffers from some deterioration. (Click on photo for larger.)

Alas, it's a Series VIII filter and I haven't found a Series VIII to 52mm adapter. But, there was an old Nikon HR-1 rubber lens hood, and I found that I could loosely hold the larger Series VIII filter in the rubber and attach it onto a 52mm thread.

So I picked out a 24mm f2.8 AI converted Nikkor lens, because it has an IR focusing index, closed the eyepiece shutter, set the ISO to 400 and the aperture to f5.6, as recommended, and did a handheld shot at about 1/3rd of a second. Just to see if I got anything.


Success!


This is lightly manipulated. (Click on photo for larger.)

Next I broke out the tripod and set the camera up by the open back deck door.


Oops, this is what happens when you pan the tripod head and you've got a black filter over the lens -- next time I'll use a level. (Click on photo for larger.)

I've ordered a cheap Opteka 52mm R72 filter from Amazon -- it's supposed to be more of a 780nm cutoff, rather than 720nm, but it'll attach to a lot of my lenses -- all of my AI Nikkors from my old camera bag and several of my AF Nikkors. Amazingly, with the R72 filter, the autofocus should actually work.

This should be fun.

Oh, and the D1 Series? They also see into the UV spectrum. Lenses are a problem, but you can use EL Nikkor enlarging lenses, apparently -- and I have one or two of them. Need a helical mount, for focusing, and a UV pass filter... don't know what that'll cost. But that'll be for later.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (norman-rockwell-thanksgiving)
Thanksgiving Weekend

As previously reported, we had Brunswick Stew on Thanksgiving itself and we did a Saturday movie. For years, when we are home for Thanksgiving, we haven't done the big meal on Thanksgiving itself, but on Friday or sometimes even Saturday.

So on Friday I was able to make a perfectly ordinary grocery store run -- which in Allendale doesn't involve getting anywhere near the insanity of the so-called Black Friday shopping nonsense. It was a pretty blue sky day and I threw a camera bag in the back of the Blazer.

Made it all the way back up our driveway before shooting this stand of exploded milkweed pods -- next year's Monarch butterflies. (Click to enlarge)

We had company scheduled to come for Thanksgiving, but they had to cancel. I was just getting back from Atlanta and Mrs. Dr. Phil was treating her sinuses, so we settled on little chickens -- Cornish hens -- which are so easy to cook versus turkey.

A whole little chicken, sage stuffing, potatoes, sweet potatoes, peas, gravy and fresh cranberry relish.


Ah, the aftermath. We eat one side of the little chickens on one day and the other the next -- and the remaining bits get used another day. Note that the one Corning Ware has both chickens. (grin)

New Toys

Mrs. Dr. Phil has been debating getting some sort of tablet or smart phone, mainly because the university library is expanding its online and borrowable e-book holdings, and she wanted to be better equipped to deal with both students and technology. Apple has refurbished iPads on sale at educational discount, and there's the iPhone and Android variants. But while I was away she decided to give the Amazon Kindle Fire a try. It certainly made being at home with her sinus cold more bearable, especially with the spiffy red case she found. (e-grin)

Here's Mrs. Dr. Phil using her Fire in the Alt-Mode to do the Sunday Sudoku from the newspaper.

She hoped it was okay to spend the money on a new toy. Okay? After I'd picked up some bargains on eBay and acquired a backup digital SLR for home -- a Nikon D1X -- and another for the office -- a Nikon D1H -- how could it not be okay?

The D1X is a 6MP camera with an extended 27 frame buffer and 3 frames per second speed, the same resolution as the medium setting on the full-frame Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n I bought last year. The D1H is a 2.7MP camera, can shoot at 5 frames per second, has a 40 frame buffer and has a more sensitive sensor up to 6400 ISO, with almost no noise at 1600 ISO, which I intend to mainly use in B&W mode.

I'd inherited from my sister Wendy an extra auto-focus lens, a simple 35-70mm f3.3-4.5 AF Nikkor, and a compact Nikon Speedlight SB-22 electronic flash, which I tested in the Kindle Fire shot above. I'll add them to the office Nikon D1H setup.

Tonight we had a spicy Szechuan eggplant -- Mrs. Dr. Phil feeling we'd had enough chicken the last couple of days. All in all, a lovely weekend. (Even if Northwestern didn't win against Michigan State.)

Dr. Phil

Super Duper 8

Sunday, 12 June 2011 23:06
dr_phil_physics: (runaway-robot)
A Cold Saturday

After setting some records in the mid-90s earlier in the week, West Michigan is in the midst of a big cool off. Driving to Holland MI after lunch, the Bravada put the heat on. And it was needed. (grin) Still, after the movie, we came out to out sunshine and blue skies -- welcome to Fall. (evil grin)

Super 8 [PG-13]
Holland 7 Theatre #3, Saturday 12 June 2011, 2:15pm

J.J. Abrams and Steven Spielberg had a 1970s love child involving a Super 8 movie camera. This much anticipated movie also featured a lot of mystery -- the first two trailers didn't give away much. This is getting so rare today that I was even pissed at the latest trailers which showed any hint of Who's In The Boxcar?

In playing the movie name game, all the current reviewers want to compare this to Spielberg's E.T.. But that's the wrong movie comparison. This is The Goonies and Jaws Remake Dawn of the Dead. OK, so that last one isn't Spielberg. But so what? As I've said repeatedly of films this year -- what Super 8 is, is Super 8. It is what it is.

And what it is, is terrific. First -- the kids are perfect. Good lord, I went to junior high with these kids. It's perfect. As is their attempt at film making. (grin) You know, I've made one film in my life. A 20-minute documentary in high school, mostly shot with a rented Canon 1014 Super 8 camera. Trust me, those kids would've killed to have a 1014 (or a Nikon R10). I didn't get a good look at the first Super 8 camera, but it was something like a Sankyo -- decent enough. But the second camera they had to use was one of those rear thumb trigger Kodak Ektasound Super 8 sound cameras. Totally cheesy.

And before we get any further, let me just say that I was pissed by the train wreck. No Way Do You Survive driving a 1970s pickup head into a train -- especially when you made the fuel tank explode. In the last few years, I've seen three great train wrecks. (1) The Fugitive -- they derailed a real train and Harrison Ford had one take to run away. (grin) (2) Hancock -- after Will Smith punches the train to stop it, the collateral damage as the cars slide around and stack up behind the broken locomotive. "That looks expensive," Will Smith laments. (3) And the repeated explosions aboard the Chicago commuter train in Source Code were fun. (I'll even say I enjoyed the "flaming death train" in Spielberg's War of the Worlds.) But... the train wreck in Super 8 is way over the top. Boxcars don't pole vault like that. However, I can forgive this and reach for more popcorn.

And that's where the fun begins. Because really, you can't question anything that goes on this film. It looks like it'll be a photo realistic feature, given the care to the 1970s decor and set dressing, but's it a ride from one end of this Ohio town to the other. Actually, it was filmed in West Virginia, but who's counting?

I said at the beginning that this is Jaws. Spielberg's first megahit worked because the shark didn't and we never got to see the shark much until late in the second half. You've got the whole government/military conspiracy and the massively inappropriate reaction -- hell, they're rolling tanks through the neighborhood shooting at everything -- a la Outbreak or Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Of course, such devastation is popcorn stuff for Americans, because we DON'T ever see tanks destroying our towns and cities.

This isn't the movie I thought it'd be. I thought it'd all be about the cover-up of something in the 70s falling apart in modern times. Instead, it's a love letter to the late 70s -- a true period piece. Blondie! "My Sharona"! Electronic football! (Never saw the fascination with that handheld game, but I knew kids who played it incessantly at school.)

You'll be on the verge of walking out of the theatre, wanting to rail against how come no one ever heard of this event, because there's no way to cover this up, not with all that TV coverage. But Abrams and Spielberg have one last gem for you that will make you feel much better. Take your SF metaphor -- either the Oracle's cookies for Neo in The Matrix or the flashy-flashy device from Men In Black. But whichever you choose:

Do Not Get Up when the credits start. You want to stay. It's the quintessential Dr. Phil Special.

And that's all I'll say of Super 8. No spoilers required. It's great popcorn fare. The Summer of 2011 is doing just FINE for big movies.

Highly Recommended

Oh -- and it was really good popcorn.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (dr-phil-nikon-f3-1983)
I Used To Be A Photographer

I worked on my school's yearbooks from Junior High through college. Eventually I had a pile of Nikon equipment and took a lot of pictures. My SF writing has taken up a lot of my "free" time, and computers in general have dulled interest in film. So my Nikons have languished for years. I've had a couple of nice little digital cameras -- all have had excellent lenses, especially the two Sony cameras with Carl Zeiss optics.

But what I wanted was a Nikon digital camera, which could use some of my old glass. Alas, the first digital Nikons have had DX sensors -- smaller than the 24mm×36mm image size of 35mm film. Thus you don't actually use all the glass in the Nikon SLR lenses, which makes the effective focal lengths longer. Plus they were expensive.

So what I really wanted was an FX sensor Nikon digital camera -- one with a full size 24mm×36mm sensor. Eventually the Nikon D3 and D700 came out, but still cost thousands of dollars.

Last Week I Had A Brainstorm

What about those Kodak digital SLRs that use a Nikon chassis and take Nikon lenses? I looked on eBay and found the Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n. Last produced in 2005, this is a 13.87 megapixel FX camera -- and they were going for far less than the Nikons. Took four auctions to get a clean unit, with a reasonable of service life left on the sensor, for a price I was willing to pay.

Welcome to the future:

The lens is a Nikon 35-135mm f/3.5-4.5D AF zoom I got on eBay for $94. Turns out that though the Pro SLR/n will use all my Nikon lenses, it won't use its exposure meter because the old lenses don't have a CPU chip in them. So I thought a general purpose lens which used all the functions would be an advantage.

But wait, Dr. Phil, I thought you said it was a Nikon? It says Kodak all over the place, not Nikon. You weren't paying attention. Kodak started with a Nikon F80 AE/AF (auto-exposure and auto-focus) film camera and grafted on the Kodak sensor and hardware. And it does have a Nikon logo on it -- see? It says "Nikon F-Mount" right there:


The Real Reason For Posting Pictures On The Internet


My cat Sam. Internal flash, 6MP original, ISO 800, reduced to 20% size.


And our cat Blue. Internal flash, 6MP original, ISO 800, reduced to 20% size.

Still working on getting settings tweaked. I'd forgotten that I'd jacked the ISO sensitivity up to 800, so the image is a little noisier that I'd expect. But I'll get the hang of it.

This is going to be fun.

Dr. Phil

Profile

dr_phil_physics: (Default)
dr_phil_physics

April 2016

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3 4567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Links

Email: drphil at

dr-phil-physics.com

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, 19 May 2026 10:58
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios