dr_phil_physics: (upsidedown-winslet)
We Meant To Do It This Way From The Start

As I pointed out in the post on the White Coke can (DW), there was a news report that the can would be coming out with a red background. And just before Christmas, we ended up getting a 24-pack with the new style.



Frankly the polar bear graphic looks a lot better with the higher contrast of the red can versus the white on silver. And they said, like New Coke/Classic Coke, that this was part of the plan? Puh-lease.

There Was A Lot Of That in 2011

In the weak but not dying economy, there seemed to be a lot of missteps and recalculations. Bank of America wanted to impose this $5 fee and next thing you know they got spanked by their customers and changed their mind. Of course they'll probably try it again in a different way in 2012, but for the moment, no fee. Verizon tried to pull something similar by adding a charge for using a credit card to make single payments. Now legitimately, credit cards do cost them, but the argument that they wanted access to people's checking accounts and have automatic payments engaged? Not a bloody chance.

Back in the spring they said that we'd have four dollar plus gas all summer (DW). Worse were the pundits which talked of five dollar gasoline, which usually means that carte blanche has been issued to the oil companies and So It Is Written, So It Shall Be Made So. But actually gas prices spent most of the rest of the year bouncing from high to mid to low three dollars -- not four. Somewhere around Mother's Day or maybe it was the Memorial Day price jump that didn't happen the madness subsided. In fact, some gas prices dropped right around the major summer driving holidays, which put people on the road in greater numbers, much to the relief of the tourist and travel industries. Not sure why the drop, but I just read where the average price for gas in all of 2011 was higher than in 2010, so we really did fork over more of our treasure to get to the same destinations.

The other year the airlines were all about the small 50-seat regional jets, and service expanded to many small cities. This year? Regional jets cost too much so they're being cut and routes are being cuts and sections of the country may lose all their service.

And an awful lot of politicians found themselves saying that they didn't mean that or reversing themselves. Or facing recall efforts, some of which are still going on. Or ballot proposals to negate some stupid-headed power grab that had nothing to do with any "crisis".

I'm still waiting for LiveJournal to rollback Release 88 (DW), but they don't yet seem to have gotten the memo -- or read the thousands and thousands of angry complaints.

I don't think this is going to end in 2012...

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (fence-winslet)
Alas Poor Catalog, I Knew Ye Well...

NPR reported this morning that J.C. Penney was ending their mail order catalog business. Interesting that they said they started it only in the 1960s (1963), unlike the Sears and Montgomery Wards catalogs which were much older.

When we lived in the U.P for 7½ years in the late 80s and early 90s -- in a time before the commercialization of the Internet, if you can remember such dark times -- we ended up doing quite a lot of mail order catalog sales. When we moved down to West Michigan, there were major Penney stores anchoring the local malls.

Of course the Internet has changed sales and I'm sure it was just a matter of time before the J.C. Penney catalog was going to become redundant or irrelevant. Not like there was a lot of choice -- Penney's is a business and has to make appropriate business decisions.

Those Pesky Local Connections

Of course one of the reasons why I'm bothering to post about this is the realization that the local Kentwood MI call center will close, eliminating 370 jobs. Many had worked there for decades. Not just the manufacturing jobs close in this economy -- something all those people touting service jobs and Internet call centers should keep in mind.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (xmas-plot-bunny)
Sigh... Will It Never End?

First it was Christmas displays starting to be assembled in stores around Labor Day -- and yes that included dates in August. Then we had Christmas stuff crowding out Halloween candy and costumes. And tons of advertising and sale flyers during November. Finally we get to Black Friday, the go-shopping-for-one-of-three-bargains-at-a-big-box-store-at-4am the day after Thanksgiving, followed inexorably by Cyber Monday, whereupon the online stores which to make the Internet crawl and bring office productivity to negative numbers on the Monday after Thanksgiving.

Now we have... Deer Season starting this weekend before Christmas.

From the Grand Rapids Press:
"Deer season" begins Saturday, in retail speak.

That’s when the most reluctant shoppers begin venturing into stores with what Kimberly Smith calls that “deer in the headlights look,” foraging for gifts.

Okay, I Get It

I certainly understand the sentiment that not every one is a shopper or a bargain hunter, that many people (many of us? grin) put off Christmas shopping until the last minute and that it is easy to be clueless as to what to get for people. So putting on extra staff in boutique shops to add last-minute and less-than-clueful customers certainly makes sense. And I also understand all the basic economics -- retail stores depend heavily on Christmas sales to make their years and 2010 as a business year has mostly royally sucked -- so savvy retailers need to do what they can to survive. I understand, even sympathize. I worked Christmas retail at Carolina Camera Center at Friendley Shopping Center for a number of years. It's busy.

It's just that my inner Grinch is rebelling at Yet Another Cutesy Christmas Shopping Day Term. Deer Season. Get it. Funny. Once. Ha.

Can we move on, please?

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (wtf-symbol)
Don't Take My Chevy Away

NPR reported on Thursday that GM had sent a memo out that henceforth employees not only should not use the name "Chevy" for "Chevrolet", but that offices should fine the employees a quarter (US25¢) every time they say "Chevy". General Motors, are you nuts?

There was a clarification update from GM that this only applies to GM employees, not civilians, but that's hardly the point. This has got to be another example of Middle Management Run Amuck, as someone or someones in the organization tries to justify their existence and idiots above them somehow think that This Should Be A Good Idea.

IDIOTS! Don't they realize that having a well establish nickname, one that you've used for YEARS in your own damn advertising (Chevy Tough / Chevy Trucks / etc.), is marketing gold? Other companies would kill for having a good nickname. VW and VW Bug -- gold. Toyota = Toy car? Yugo = You Go Nowhere? Not so much.

I grew up in a GM owning family. I don't really remember the 1956 car, but we had Chevy cars forever: 1960 Bel-Air, 1964 / 1968 / 1972 Malibu Chevelle. We didn't get a new Chevy in 1976 because my folks were starting to pay for Northwestern, but they bought one of the first Cavaliers and have had Chevy Cavaliers ever since. My first vehicle was a 1979 Chevy Suburban, followed by a used 1982 Cavalier wagon when we started needing two vehicles, a new 1989 Chevy S-10 Blazer (2WD), then used 1985 / 1994 / 1996 Chevy S-10 Blazers (4WD). Indeed, our first non-Chevy was the used 1999 Olds Bravada -- and not only was it a GM product, but hell, GM threw away the Oldsmobile label which had its own successful nickname, Olds.

It's all about branding. Sure. But a killer nickname? You can't buy good will like that. And to try to ruin it by banning it in the corporatespeak? GM, you're being idiots. And the publicity you're going to get out of it? Not one bit of it will be about professionalism or competence. Period.

Don't Bother Calling Back

One problem of being home during Sabbatical 1.21 is that I get the joy of receiving more stupid phone calls.

Ring-Ring

ME: Hello?

IDIOT: Is this Phil?

ME: Who's calling?

IDIOT: (long pause) This-is-(garbled)-from-the-Police-Benevolent-Society-returning-your-call...

ME: We don't do anything over the phone. (click)

I suppose that telephone spammers and scammers give themselves high fives whenever they come up with or steal a great new idea to con people into actually talking with them. "Returning your call"? Yeah, right. Anyone who knows me knows that I don't like cold calling people, so it is HIGHLY unlikely that I'd be calling anyone, including a charitable organization, when I can contact them online or by mail. And I hate giving out contact information, so the very likelihood that you would be returning my call, which presupposes that I made a call first, is pretty much close to zero point zero. We. Don't. Do. Any. Crap. Over. The. Phone.

Pth-hhhhbt! It pisses me off that the politicians included exemptions for (a) charities and (b) THEMSELVES when they put together the Do Not Call List legislation. No points for creativity and ESPECIALLY no points for launching into a rapid fire mutterance which doesn't properly identify you, your organization (WHICH Police Benevolent Society? There are so many jurisdictions here, even assuming you aren't just a scummy scammer.) and trying to slip that little lie in about returning my call.

From Russia, With Love

While I'm bitching about phone spam, I should note that after several months of freedom after LiveJournal beefed up things on their end a bit, I've had several attempts to spam this LJ in the last week. Two were Anonymous and one had an LJ userid -- all were in Cyrillic and all could be translated from Russian to English by Google. What really pisses me off are the ones which try to add spam comments to my LJ postings with my stories in them.

It was because of these bastards I had to implement screening Anonymous comments the other year, though I still allow them. And sometimes you'll see some comment spam from someone with an LJ userid before I find out about it. My apologies for their bad behavior.

A Respite

Finally, just to take away the bad taste from above, [livejournal.com profile] jimhines posted this link about:
...this functional LEGO sniper rifle, built by Jack Streat. I’d probably want to double the rubber bands to get better range, but still — this thing has a working clip, tripod, and scope, and appears to be pretty darn accurate for a LEGO rifle.

I was amused to see that when loading the LEGO "bullets" into the magazine, you alternate which way they go so that the nubs don't lock together like LEGOs. (grin) Is there anything you CAN'T build with LEGOs?

Dr. Phil

Profile

dr_phil_physics: (Default)
dr_phil_physics

April 2016

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3 4567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Links

Email: drphil at

dr-phil-physics.com

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Saturday, 24 May 2025 19:00
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios