dr_phil_physics: (7of9borg)
Stupid, stupid spammers. Really? This is a notice from "State Court"?

I love how we're on a first name basis.

Oh sure, there's a ZIP file attachment as if I'd open that fucker, but this email doesn't contain my name, my address, the court, the judge, the case number -- anything -- even assuming I would get such a notice via email. And the sender's address? Puh-lease. "DexesAmpuAnBayi.com is hosted in Istanbul."

I doubt that Leslie, under oath, could even NAME which state this State Court is in.

Worst. Summons. Ever.
Subject: PHIL, Notice to Appear
From: State Court<leslie.olsen@dexesampuanbayi.com> Attachment
Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:59 PM

To: dr.phil@xxxx

Dear Phil,

You have to appear in the Court on the March 23.
Please, prepare all the documents relating to the case and bring them to Court on the specified date.
Note: The case may be heard by the judge in your absence if you do not come.

You can review complete details of the Court Notice in the attachment.

Kind regards,
Leslie Olsen,
District Clerk.
For a while I hadn't been getting a lot of stupid spam. But lately? It's like these people aren't even trying and they're just looking for low hanging fruit.

Oh, and should one of these things ever be real? I would sue. Because no one in their right mind would take this seriously.

Color me, as my grandfather would say, regusted.

Dr. Phil
Posted on Dreamwidth
Crossposted on LiveJournal
dr_phil_physics: (7of9borg)
Ring... ring... ring... ring...

Mrs. Dr. Phil is working on our Day-After-Thanksgiving-Movie-Day holiday dinner. Slow-Moving-Boy has to stand up from the rolltop desk, gather one, two canes, and slowly maneuver across the room, stop, set both canes in one hand and pick up the phone, which has already gone to the outgoing answering machine message. Colliding with An Important Message which is SO Important that not only is there no human being involved, it is too impatient to wait for the beep, colliding with the outgoing message. Brilliant.

"...mail provider..."

I think the recording was talking about e-mail provider. And amazingly, the recorded female voice sounded a lot like the spam recording from "Card Services" announcing a problem with our credit card.

We get that one a lot.

No doubt the message was along the lines that there was a problem with my e-mail provider -- or that my mailbox was full and some other provider was unable to send me an important message. Sure. Right. What info do you need to confirm it's me that YOU'RE CALLING? Name? Address? Phone number? The credit card for the billing department for sure.

Right.

First of all, our emails are all through Gmail (free), GVSU/WMU (free) and my website. Second, no one would use a spam recording to let you know of a problem. And if it's a sales call? Any way you look at it, we don't do anything by phone.

Period.

I hung up and returned to writing. I'm sure that the phone line was tied up for another minute or two, no matter what I did on my end. Fine, the spam machine can talk to the aether and let's see if I care.

Nope.

Don't care about them.

Not. One. Twit.

Merry Black Thanks Friday Giving Mas.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (7of9borg)
I Worry About The Quality Of Our Spammers

I mean, they aren't trying very hard. Why would I respond to, let alone read, an email that:

-- has my email as the sender
-- starts off with RE: in the subject line for which there is no 1st message
-- says my AT&T bill is ready... from support@irs.gov
-- says FedEx can't diliver my package
-- asks about my airline reservation from USAirways, American or United (since my leg injury, I haven't flown anywhere in two years)
-- any email with NO SUBJECT line
-- any email about drugs or pills
-- says it's about an invoice from some place I've never heard of

Sorry. How stupid do you think I am?

Still, all might not be well in the spam business. I go through the spam folder on my work account about once a month. Usually there are some 40 to 75 pages of entries -- today there was only 17.

Almost makes you feel sorry for them.

Nope. Gotcha. Don't feel anything but pissed off that these idiots waste my time and prey on people. Kill them -- kill them all. No Internet privileges for you. No cookie.

Have a nice day.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (writing-winslet-2)
Today's Login Message...

Actually, I don't get login messages when I log into my LJ account. Except today:
Sign up for a FREE two-week trial of a LiveJournal Paid Account and you'll enjoy an ad-free environment, 30 userpics, hundreds of premium journal styles, LiveJournal Stats, Google Analytics, and more! Click here to learn more!

The reason I don't get login messages and ads is that I have a LiveJournal Permanent Account, which is sort of an Über Paid Account. In other words, I am supposed to have an ad-free environment and over 200 userpics, etc.

Yes, yes, I know that it's probably like junk mail -- it costs too much to include a search term in the ad spam broadcast to check. But really, don't offend your Paid and Permanent Accounts. (evil grin)

Sorry this isn't anything more interesting or amusing. On the other hand, after working really, really hard at a furious pace, I may survive the month of March in one piece. (grin)

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (7of9voyager)
I'm A Reasonable Person

I understand that some of my readers, including Mrs. Dr. Phil, don't have LiveJournal accounts or want to mess with using some of the alternative logins via Facebook, etc.

So I do allow Anonymous posting of comments. However, for obvious reasons I have Anonymous comments go straight into the moderation queue, which I usually check at least once or twice a day. In fact, I get notified about all comments to my blog.

However, For Those Of You Who Are Idiots

There are those of you around the whole who wish to abuse my LiveJournal blog, and I have zero tolerance for this. This includes:

(1) Anonymous trolls who want to use my posts to either foment controversy or somehow think they can change my mind with Stupid Troll comments or promote their own Personal Asshattery or want to annoy me.

(2) Anonymous spam bastards who want to use my posts, often one or two years old, to try to insert ads for their various drugs, sex videos, counterfeit clothing, probably diseased websites or web services, or other nefarious, illegal and/or disgusting activities. And I really get upset when you decide you can trash postings of mine that are rather important to me.

Please note that as a Permanent Account holder, I do not puts ads on my LiveJournal -- if you see ads when reading my blog it is because you aren't a logged in paid LJ user who can choose to not see ads. Further, the only commercial promotions that I allow on my LiveJournal blog are either my own writings or things that I find of value that I choose to promote. You, especially Anonymous yous, do not get to override my decisions.

If you fall into either of these Idiot classifications, do us both a favor and don't even bother to post spam or troll crap on my LJ. Because I will delete them, but I will also save copies of your crap and your URL. This also applies to postings which have LiveJournal account names -- these LJ users will be reported to LiveJournal for spam activity.

Sorry To Waste Everyone Else's Time With This

But in the last week I've had to scrub out my moderation queue with twelve items of disgusting spammy content -- some of them from the same people beating their stupid spammy heads against the same unmoving brick wall. It's a waste of my time and I'm sorry if any of this shows up temporarily from illegitimate LJ usernames.

To my friends and family and casual readers of my blog -- glad you're here and I try to reply to all your comments in due course. Thanks.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (wtf-symbol)
Don't Take My Chevy Away

NPR reported on Thursday that GM had sent a memo out that henceforth employees not only should not use the name "Chevy" for "Chevrolet", but that offices should fine the employees a quarter (US25¢) every time they say "Chevy". General Motors, are you nuts?

There was a clarification update from GM that this only applies to GM employees, not civilians, but that's hardly the point. This has got to be another example of Middle Management Run Amuck, as someone or someones in the organization tries to justify their existence and idiots above them somehow think that This Should Be A Good Idea.

IDIOTS! Don't they realize that having a well establish nickname, one that you've used for YEARS in your own damn advertising (Chevy Tough / Chevy Trucks / etc.), is marketing gold? Other companies would kill for having a good nickname. VW and VW Bug -- gold. Toyota = Toy car? Yugo = You Go Nowhere? Not so much.

I grew up in a GM owning family. I don't really remember the 1956 car, but we had Chevy cars forever: 1960 Bel-Air, 1964 / 1968 / 1972 Malibu Chevelle. We didn't get a new Chevy in 1976 because my folks were starting to pay for Northwestern, but they bought one of the first Cavaliers and have had Chevy Cavaliers ever since. My first vehicle was a 1979 Chevy Suburban, followed by a used 1982 Cavalier wagon when we started needing two vehicles, a new 1989 Chevy S-10 Blazer (2WD), then used 1985 / 1994 / 1996 Chevy S-10 Blazers (4WD). Indeed, our first non-Chevy was the used 1999 Olds Bravada -- and not only was it a GM product, but hell, GM threw away the Oldsmobile label which had its own successful nickname, Olds.

It's all about branding. Sure. But a killer nickname? You can't buy good will like that. And to try to ruin it by banning it in the corporatespeak? GM, you're being idiots. And the publicity you're going to get out of it? Not one bit of it will be about professionalism or competence. Period.

Don't Bother Calling Back

One problem of being home during Sabbatical 1.21 is that I get the joy of receiving more stupid phone calls.

Ring-Ring

ME: Hello?

IDIOT: Is this Phil?

ME: Who's calling?

IDIOT: (long pause) This-is-(garbled)-from-the-Police-Benevolent-Society-returning-your-call...

ME: We don't do anything over the phone. (click)

I suppose that telephone spammers and scammers give themselves high fives whenever they come up with or steal a great new idea to con people into actually talking with them. "Returning your call"? Yeah, right. Anyone who knows me knows that I don't like cold calling people, so it is HIGHLY unlikely that I'd be calling anyone, including a charitable organization, when I can contact them online or by mail. And I hate giving out contact information, so the very likelihood that you would be returning my call, which presupposes that I made a call first, is pretty much close to zero point zero. We. Don't. Do. Any. Crap. Over. The. Phone.

Pth-hhhhbt! It pisses me off that the politicians included exemptions for (a) charities and (b) THEMSELVES when they put together the Do Not Call List legislation. No points for creativity and ESPECIALLY no points for launching into a rapid fire mutterance which doesn't properly identify you, your organization (WHICH Police Benevolent Society? There are so many jurisdictions here, even assuming you aren't just a scummy scammer.) and trying to slip that little lie in about returning my call.

From Russia, With Love

While I'm bitching about phone spam, I should note that after several months of freedom after LiveJournal beefed up things on their end a bit, I've had several attempts to spam this LJ in the last week. Two were Anonymous and one had an LJ userid -- all were in Cyrillic and all could be translated from Russian to English by Google. What really pisses me off are the ones which try to add spam comments to my LJ postings with my stories in them.

It was because of these bastards I had to implement screening Anonymous comments the other year, though I still allow them. And sometimes you'll see some comment spam from someone with an LJ userid before I find out about it. My apologies for their bad behavior.

A Respite

Finally, just to take away the bad taste from above, [livejournal.com profile] jimhines posted this link about:
...this functional LEGO sniper rifle, built by Jack Streat. I’d probably want to double the rubber bands to get better range, but still — this thing has a working clip, tripod, and scope, and appears to be pretty darn accurate for a LEGO rifle.

I was amused to see that when loading the LEGO "bullets" into the magazine, you alternate which way they go so that the nubs don't lock together like LEGOs. (grin) Is there anything you CAN'T build with LEGOs?

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (7of9borg)
I Will Not Be Assimilated

Looked at my LJ's View Recent Comments page and found that some asshole targeted this blog for some thirteen comment spams over thirteen of my posts -- lots of links to geisha sluts and teen porn and other savory delights. (NOT) All dated some 7 hours ago. Banned her, marked her as spam, deleted all comments by her.

Go away!

My Apologies

To any of the few human beings who ever actually read my blog, I apologize if you actually ran into this crap.

Uptick

I've already seen three other cases of blog comment spam on other people's blogs in the last couple of days. LJ themselves said they had a new anti-spam system in place and had cleared out and banned a whole lot of shadow users. I guess they've had some effect -- almost all the other annoying suckass comment spam I've had this LJ came from Anonymous people, who I'd ensnared in the moderation queue and not let you be subject to this crap.

Mostly they've targeted one particular older posting, but not this time.

And my e-mail spam has greatly increased in the last two or three weeks. Wonderful.

Idiots. Useless stupid idiots. I guess you can guess that I am not impressed by this form of bad behavior. (grin)

You may resume your normal, more pleasant perusal of teh Internets. (sigh)

UPDATE: I had to go in and remove each of the thirteen instances. Fortunately, they were all done about the same time, but this is real Whack-a-Mole shit. Could get ugly. If I start moderating ALL comments, you'll know why.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (sick-winslet)
Sigh

I guess I let it go too long again. Back on 24 October 2009 I wrote about shoveling through 72 pages of spam on my WMU mail account. That was two weeks ago.

So today I checked the Pure Spam trap and found... 67 pages of spam. And again, I really have to wade through them all to make sure I don't miss something important.

Oops

Oh crap I just marked twenty messages and hit the wrong button. The DELIVER MESSAGES button comes first -- and the DELETE MESSAGES comes second. Who the hell came up with this system? In a spam control system, your first choice is to send the messages on? In what alternate universe do these programmers live? And while I'm pissed, what's up with not having an UNDO or CANCEL button?

Second, while they have a button to look over the list of messages you just deleted, there isn't one for the delivery queue. And the 20 messages I have to go and delete in my mail account aren't there yet. They're just waiting for me to finish the session and I log out, I imagine. So rather than deal with my mistake and their bad programming now, I have to remember doing it later. Good, clever, wonderful. Will somebody get a clue-by-four and beat the crap out of the Pure Spam programmers for me?

Dammit

What's the point of having an unhelpful, unuseful and unreasonable spam screening system -- lately a WHOLE lot of spam has been reaching my WMU account, so despite 67 pages of spam, it should've been 72+ pages.

Spammers? Bastards.

Pure Spam? Epic Fail Bastards.

It all sucks, dammit.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (sick-winslet)
Cruising The Spam Filters

My main personal email account has a pretty reasonable spam filter. Hardly ever does anything sucky make it through, but since it displays a nice "Spam 2" notice if there are two messages in the Spam folder, it's easy to check and delete.

Not so pleasant with my work account. First, about half the email I get in my Inbox actually comes from No Address or some sort of %&*%#$! character swearing which is probably an ASCII attempt at some non-lettered language or out-and-out Crap/Spam. Some of it is so obviously spamming, I wonder just what the hell kind of algorithm the spam filter uses. As for the spam filter, it's a third-party add-on product, requiring one to log separately into your account in the Pure Spam (not its real name) filter system. Then you can decide to delete or accept or ignore messages based only on their email sender names and part of the subject header. Oh, you can hover your mouse over the sender's name or the subject and get a mouse-over box with what's really there. You cannot see the actual email in the spam system, you'd have to approve the message, and then read it over in the email inbox.

Why do I put up with such an obviously Mickey Mouse system? Because I have no choice. Also, twice I've discovered Important E-Mails in amongst the spam, so I really do have to wade through it all.

These Assholes Should Just Die

I guess I let the Pure Spam go for over a week or two. Just finished wading through 72 pages of spam notices, 20 to a page, and naturally found nothing of value.

It is a wee bit interesting to see the rough breakdown of types of messages and the inane attempts people sub-human spammers use in their Subject lines to try to get me to read their crap. Mrs. Dr. Phil keeps saying that there are good Sociology Ph.D. dissertation topics in amongst the spam headers. But really, I am NOT going to read any spam message from me. So use your own email address, even it's if a cutout or just plain false.

Last year there were a significant number of spams for cheap/free copies of Photoshop, AutoCad and other expensive pieces of software. Today? Almost none of those. This summer it was all about the Cialis. Now a good chunk is still about ED drugs, but Cialis is almost never mentioned by name, Viagra a bit more mention. A few messages about actress/starlet/model/singer/whore X or Y behaving badly on video. But the big winner on those 72 pages, possibly hitting as high as 50% of the crap, were degree diplomas -- any kind your want. Some from "real universities".

Uh-huh. Yeah, right. And while we're on this subject, WTF are you doing sending degree scam spam to someone who earned a Ph.D. the hard way? And Faculty/Staff at a university? Are there that many professors who don't have real degrees, that you need to sell them something so fake that it'd be worse than having no degrees at all? Puh-lease!

The Law of Small Numbers (and Small Minds)

Sigh. The sad thing is not that the Internet is so riddled with these little worms, but rather they wouldn't send out spam if it didn't work. I mean, you don't actually have to have that many idiots responding out of hundreds or thousands of spams sent to make some money, apparently. So until someone decides that it IS fair game to hunt these people down and hang them from their testicles until they are either dead or maimed, we are going to have to deal with ever more clever (so to speak) spammer techniques. And as long as spam filters aren't totally reliable, I am going to have to wade through the crap.

Just so I don't miss something important, such as happened twice. Over years.

Sigh.

Dr. Phil
dr_phil_physics: (lifesavers-winslet)
Physics Spam

From American Physical Society <aps@aps.org>
Sent Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:35 am
Subject Giant Revolution in the Physics Science
Attachments NewsLetter.htm 7K

(If you see this message in text mode, then please view our attached NewsLetter.htm file!)

AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY

Sent by Philip Maurone, Villanova University; Bryan Penprase, Pomona College; Alan Dorsey, University of Florida; Matthew Moelter, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo; Adella Ahmidouch, North Carolina A&T State University; Harry Tom, University of California, Riverside, Bob Cahn, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab; Nick Hadley, University of Maryland; Sarah Eno, University of Maryland; Chip Brock, Michigan State University, in agreement with last year's Nobel Laureate men: Yoichiro Nambu, Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa.

Not necessaries more experiments, theories and models about the particle and atomic world, because now exists the very simple and real physics of these!

This is an exceptional and private notice from ten members of APS to all physicists in the world. Six months ago we heard about the paper of Prof. Gabor Fekete, who is a hungarian physicist. We were thoughtfully that the theories and models of the particle and atomic physics every were till now incorrects. The professor reinterprets the total known experimental results and uses solely the mathematical apparatus of dynamics and electrodynamics. With these he got back with eight numeral exactitude the values about every till now known experimental results. We state positively that her paper is the giant revolution of the physics science. We wish with this mail to suggest Prof. Gabor Fekete for Nobel Prize.

Because we know very well that this news not will be welcomed by everybody (we for this reason selected this way to your notice), therefore if you also think to nominate for Nobel Prize the author of the paper, then you are requested to exert pressure on The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, so that you do send an email to Prof. Ingmar Bergström and/or Prof. Per Carlson

The their other availablities:

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, SWEDEN

Phone: +46 8 673 95 00, Fax: +46 8 15 56 70

Please, forward this email with the original subject to your journalist and other acquaintances too! Thanks.

The article: THE REAL PARTICLE AND ATOMIC PHYSICS - INSTEAD OF THEORIES - WITH REINTERPRETATION OF THE KNOWN EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND CONFIRMED BY THE LAWS OF THE CLASSICAL PHYSICS. www.physics1.tar.hu

We sent our notice to 70775 members of 6095 research labs, institutes, faculties and departments of physics, astronomy, mathematics and chemistry in 103 countries and merely in the United States 1015 universities and colleges.


Huh?

This just seems hinky to me. No one spams 70,000+ physicists and expects no consequences. And given the large roster of "supporters", the English is atrocious. Most non-native English speaking Physicists I know would never spam a message this bad to the world -- most speak decent English and can write better English anyway!

I emailed one of the names on the list of people. Yeah, it's not from them. They are aware of it. The first spam messages said it was from APS, but had a yahoo e-mail return address in this guy's name. Needless to say, this ain't legitimate.

What the hell is going on?

Dr. Phil

Profile

dr_phil_physics: (Default)
dr_phil_physics

April 2016

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3 4567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Links

Email: drphil at

dr-phil-physics.com

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, 14 April 2026 19:37
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios